The Fries Sucked
I
generally do not use social media or restaurant review sites as the basis for my
decisions on where to eat. The sites and information can often be misleading,
inaccurate, and generally unhelpful. People feel they are qualified to
serve as a critic for the simple reason that they eat food. Yet, most people lack basic kitchen knowledge, let alone the
culinary expertise needed to truly be a restaurant critic.
Even a good review can be
misleading as they often don’t give enough information to help you make an
informed decision. Without a clear definition of the customers’
expectations and then a clear description of the product and how it met or failed
to meet the definition, the reviews often lack substance on which to base an
informed decision as to whether you should eat at the restaurant.
Since
we all have such a wide variety of likes, dislikes, and numerous preferences
tied to each, ensuring the review pertains to your food preferences is more
important than how many stars the reviewer gave the restaurant. Not to mention
how your mood can affect how much you enjoy your meal. We have all eaten food
that we were “not in the mood for” and if we reviewed it after that food, even
a good meal could render a bad review. “I hated that pizza…, because I really
wanted tacos.” Accurate, maybe, but definitely not helpful.
I have
seen some horrible reviews of establishments that serve great food based on my personal
preferences. “Worst Buffet ever!” This is not a helpful critique of a
restaurant that in fact does not have a buffet. Yes, I have seen a review this
poorly constructed, literally blaming the restaurant for not being the kind of
restaurant they wanted. Here’s a hint, if they have a buffet, they will almost
always advertise it. Otherwise it’s safe to assume they do not.
In
order for a review to be helpful we need accurate and informative information that
establishes what the reviewer was looking for, what was ordered, how it was
prepared, and if it met their expectations. And most importantly, if it did
not, specifically how did it fail?
Saying
something like the “The fries sucked,” is not helpful information as it doesn’t
give the expectations you had of the fries or describe where they failed. If
you happen to like crispy thin cut fries and they serve thick steak fries or
crinkle cut fries, your experience will be less enjoyable, but that has nothing
to do with the quality of the food. Someone who loves crinkle cut fries may see
this negative review and know that their experience will be different as they
will get the kind of fries they love.

Some
reviews are meant to purposely harm a business and have no relevance to the
food or operations. Often, they come from disgruntled employees, or are based
on other outside conflicts that have nothing to do with the business and have
questionable nonfood experience motives. Yes, people actually lie online, (and
you thought that only happened on tinder.)
So,
go ahead and read the reviews, but use it as a frame of reference instead of using
it to rule out a potential restaurant. Then give it a try yourself and judge it
based on your own experience. If you decide to share your experience and be a
social media food critic, make sure you do so in a helpful manner.
Comments
Post a Comment